
When reading Greg Sarris, The Woman Who Loved a Snake, many thoughts had crossed my mind. First of all, I'm not fond of snakes but ironically I was born in the year of the snake according to the zodiac. For me, the snake has always seemed to symbolize a negative image. However, I was also confused by the meaning behind the story that Mabel McKay has told Sarah. It was interesting how the context of the story of "The Woman Who Loved a Snake" were being compared with Shakespeare in the essay. I don't really understand Shakespeare much myself and in contrast to the story of the woman and the snake, I also considered the same feelings about the real meaning of the spoken words but more importantly the perceptual messages and context of cultures as listeners and readers. As we have touched upon in class discussion, Sarah and Mabel McKay differs in their cultures, traditions, and languages, so, it was problematic by the hidden and true meanings of the snake and the man in the story. To Mabel McKay, she was just practicing her culture's oral traditions, but to Sarah there was more to the story than it was told because it raises the questions of what's real and what's not real. Language is very important to every single beings because that is what we all practice when communicating with one another. But if we're not careful when using words and languages to communicate, the words can easily be confused to have infinite meanings. There's a saying that my mom would always say to me whenever I'm quiet around others, that "words does not cost money to buy." I guess my mom just wanted to encourage me to be more talkative to communicate with others, but I always found that the meanings of these words changes diachronically as I grow older and experiencing life.




